SULLIVAN CO. – A former part-owner of the Sullivan Automotive Group has been arrested following a lengthy investigation into alleged financial improprieties dating back to 2020. Indiana State Police (ISP) Master Trooper Detective Tim Denby initiated the investigation in June of 2024 after receiving information regarding a former employee of the Sullivan County dealership.
The investigation, conducted by the ISP Special Investigations, Organized Crime and Corruption division, revealed that between April 2020 and April 2023, the former employee, identified as Joseph A. Mascari, age 57, of Terre Haute, Indiana, allegedly deprived the Sullivan Automotive Group of significant funds. Mascari was reportedly a part-owner of the dealership during this period.
According to the ISP, the diligent criminal investigation uncovered several schemes allegedly orchestrated by Mascari. These schemes involved numerous thefts and forgeries, the unauthorized extension of control over company funds, and the inflation of invoice amounts, all purportedly for Mascari’s financial gain. The total amount of cash monies allegedly misappropriated is estimated to be approximately $297,000.00.
Upon reviewing the detailed investigation, Sullivan County Prosecutor Ann Mischler requested an arrest warrant for Joseph Mascari. He was apprehended without incident this afternoon and is currently being held in the Sullivan County Jail. His bond has been set at $117,000, with 10% allowed.
Troopers Chandler Stanton, Tyler Turchi, Caleb Hughes, and Brandon Bonebrake, all of the Putnamville State Police Post, assisted the Indiana State Police in the arrest.
Joseph A. Mascari faces the following charges:
- Corrupt Business Influence, Class 5 Felony
- Theft Value of Property Greater Than $50,000, Class 5 Felony
- Theft Where Value of Property is between $750 & $50,000, Class 6 Felony (5 counts)
- Forgery with Intent to Defraud, Class 6 Felony (5 counts)
Those facing criminal charges are considered innocent unless convicted through due legal proceedings. Accusations alone do not imply guilt; the judicial system will evaluate the presented evidence to reach a verdict.
